Snapdragon 8 Elite, Dimensity 9500, Exynos 1580, Tensor G5, A19 Pro… The processor (also called the chip) decides how fast a smartphone is, how it copes with games and how long it stays useful. But the names say almost nothing. Here is what the 2026 chips are really worth, measured on hundreds of devices, and which phones use them.

Figures are from 21 September 2026. The prices quoted are verified new offers in France on 22 September; they change often, so check them before you buy.

How we measure

We start from the Geekbench 7 multi-core score, published for every device in Geekbench’s public ranking, on a scale shared by Android and iPhone. For each chip we take the median of the devices that use it (tablets excluded), then turn it into a score out of 100 with the same scale as the performance score on Picksly pages. This score mostly measures the processor; it says little about graphics.

The chip ranking

ChipDevices measuredMedian multi-core scoreScore out of 100Examples on Picksly
Apple A19 Pro38 777100iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone Air
Apple A1918 29793iPhone 17
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 537 68684OnePlus 15, Honor Magic8 Pro, vivo iQOO 15
Snapdragon 8 Elite177 62083Galaxy S25, S25+, S25 Ultra, S25 Edge
Apple A1837 58482iPhone 16, 16 Plus, 16e
Apple A17 Pro26 85170iPhone 15 Pro, 15 Pro Max
Dimensity 950046 25160vivo X300, Oppo Find X9 Pro
Exynos 240026 02957Galaxy S24, S24+
Dimensity 930036 02557vivo X100 Pro, Oppo Find X7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3135 55549Galaxy S24 Ultra, Galaxy Z Fold 6
Tensor G525 41447Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2184 53033Galaxy S23 Ultra, Galaxy Z Fold 5
Tensor G443 79721Pixel 9, Pixel 9 Pro
Exynos 158013 70519Galaxy A56
Dimensity 8400 Ultra13 28813Poco X7 Pro
Exynos 148013 22512Galaxy A55
Snapdragon 6 Gen 312 7935Galaxy A36
Exynos 138022 7514Galaxy A54, A35
Dimensity 630011 9810Galaxy A16
Helio G9921 8920Galaxy A15

Read with care: this is a median. The same processor can run a little faster or slower depending on the phone, its cooling and its settings.

What to take away

The very top: Apple and Snapdragon 8 Elite

The A19 Pro and A19 of the iPhone 17 lead, closely followed by the Snapdragon 8 Elite and 8 Elite Gen 5, found in the Galaxy S25 and most 2025-2026 Android flagships. The gap between these chips is small: all of them are more than enough for years of use, games included.

Last year’s flagships: often the best value

2024 flagship chips (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Exynos 2400, Dimensity 9300) sit in the middle of the scale, far ahead of new mid-range chips. Example found: a Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400, score 57) at €554, against a Galaxy A56 (Exynos 1580, score 19) at €359. An older flagship is often more powerful than a recent mid-range phone.

Mid-range and entry level

The Exynos 1580 and 1480, the Dimensity 8400 Ultra or the Tensor G4 have modest scores (12 to 21). At entry level, Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Exynos 1380, Dimensity 6300 and Helio G99 sit at the very bottom, for example the Galaxy A16 (€269) or the Galaxy A15 (€189). A score of 0 does not mean “slow” for messaging, browsing or videos: it means the gap with the best chips is large, especially for demanding games.

What the processor does not tell you

The chip is only one criterion. Camera, battery life, RAM, the length of updates and screen size matter just as much day to day. On the Picksly Smartphones page, every model has its performance, camera, battery and memory scores with their sources, and you can filter by price and size.

Frequently asked questions

Snapdragon or Dimensity?

Within the same generation, both are close at the top: the Dimensity 9500 and the Snapdragon 8 Elite are near each other. The gap is mostly between ranges (8, 7, 6 at Qualcomm; 9000, 8000, 7000, 6000 at MediaTek), not between brands.

Is an iPhone faster than an Android phone?

On the multi-core score, recent Apple chips lead, just ahead of the Snapdragon 8 Elite. At the same price, recent iPhones also get a better performance score than Android phones of the same age.

And when a model’s performance is published nowhere?

Picksly estimates it from phones with the same chip, and shows it as an estimate, never as a measurement. Checked against measured phones, this estimate lands within ±10 points in 8 cases out of 10.